Monday, August 3, 2015

US Court To Decide If Chimps Have Human Rights



US Court To Decide If Chimps Have Human Rights

Image source: NYTimes
Image source: NYTimes
FINALLY THEY GET OBOZO IN THE WITNESS STAND IN HIS TRUE FACE....WE ARE FOLLOWING THIS ONE CLOSE AS THE TRIAL IS TAKING PLACE IN AFRICA IN A SECRET, SECRET, PLACE UNDER THE US EMBASSY... ALL OF THE PHONY JUDGES AND ACTORS WERE FLOWN IN TO ADD REALISM...****

A New York judge heard a case Wednesday of two chimpanzees whose lawyer is arguing that they are being detained “unlawfully.”
This is being championed by well-known ethicist Peter Singer, who argues that this case is “narrowing the gulf” between humans and animals.
The chimpanzees  at Stony Brook University in New York are there for biomedical experiments. They’re named Hercules and Leo.
“That provides the first glimmer of an opening — I wouldn’t put it further than that — that possibly the courts are not going to class chimpanzees simply as property, but are going to say that they may have some legal right to be free or to be sent to a sanctuary or something of that sort,” he said on an Australian TV program.
“The law recognizes things that are not human beings as persons — corporations are a clear example. So it would mean that they have standing in court to claim those rights.”
Christopher Coulston, the New York assistant attorney general for the case, has warned that a pro-chimp ruling could provide “for the release of other animals … housed at a zoo, in an educational institution, on a farm, or owned as a domesticated pet”
So, should animals have the same rights under the law as humans? If one believes that we evolved from primates, then it is possible that same person would believe that animals should have rights like humans because they are similar, just less evolved. However, if God created all things, then it is important to see what God had to say about the animals and mankind when He created them in order to gain a biblical view of what rights an animal should have versus a human being.
When God created the animals, He spoke them into existence, much as He did with everything that was created before them. He created fish and birds on the fifth day (Gen. 1:20-23) and he gave them the command to “be fruitful and multiply.” On the sixth day God created land animals and gave them the same command. Conversely, when God created man on the sixth day, a few things were different. The Bible says that God created man out of the dust of the ground (Gen. 2:7). This is unique. Later, when God pronounces the curse on the man and the woman after the fall, He says, “for you are dust, and to dust you shall return” (Gen. 3:19). Additionally, the Bible says that God “breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living creature” (Gen. 2:7). This is accepted by most commentators as the moment in which mankind received a spirit, making human beings different from animals as the only beings to possess a body and a spirit. There is a significant difference in the way that mankind was created compared to how the animals were created.
Next, one sees that God imbued mankind with a special trait that only human beings possess. God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth” (Gen. 1:26). Thus, God made mankind in His own image; human beings bear the image of God! No animal can claim this. This gives mankind a special value that animals do not possess. Later, the killing of animals is sanctioned by God (Gen. 4:4; Ac. 10:13), and God condemns the killing of human beings (Gen. 9:6; Ex. 20:13). So it is clear that God sees humans as bearing a greater value than animals.
What, then, is the difference between mankind and animals concerning rights? God gave the man and the woman the same command He gave to the animals: Be fruitful and multiply. However, he gave them another command. He said, “fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth” (Gen. 1:28). God entrusted mankind with the management of the animals and the subduing of the earth. Human beings were placed in charge of the animals as God’s representatives to the animals. Animals were not made on the same level as human beings. Instead, animals were made for human beings. The only similarities that animals share with humans, from an ontological perspective, are that they were created by God and given the command to multiply.
It is a good thing to recognize the value of that which God has created. It is another thing entirely to try and give something a worth and value that God has not ascribed to it. God made it clear through His creative design, mankind was the pinnacle of creation and was wholly different from the rest of creation. Mankind is the only created being to be imbued with the image of God. Therefore, mankind has unique rights and privileges not shared by any other created thing. Animals should not be mistreated, abused or neglected. Why? Because they are valuable in the eyes of God simply because he saw fit to create them. However, one should not go so far as to put animals on the same level as humans.
Do you agree or disagree? Share your thoughts in the section below: 
++++ NOT TRUE, BUT IS IT? REALLY SOUNDS GOOD. LETS REALLY MAKE IT HAPPEN!!!

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I knew it was a matter of time for alien hybrids, reptilians, and others to want their rights.
It started with the Article 14 making free people slaves on paper only; and then placing people in the public to feed us, you are a slave because this paper was created by someone after you were born, and since it has a name and we tell you, you have a name, and since it says what time you were born, and you weren't there but you believe you were born at that time well, the paper is you, we have the paper, which means we have you.

Then the people got up in arms, and wanted to kill anything that worked in the system, and prep against the system hoping it fails, and they can kill all the people roaming about not knowing they are hiding in their homes because the people walked by their homes looking for vacant homes, and they hope to pop up as some of the only ones living, and will probably kill the others that pop up as some of the only ones living. Last one with food wins until they have no more food, I guess.

All things created by the Creator have rights, rich or poor, recruited into terrorist groups against their will or not. All have rights, and it's not for any one man pope or none to decide the fate of another man with immunity and impunity.

It is also not for uninformed people who do not know the things they NEED TO KNOW, to convict and cause to be held indefinitely or for a length of time anyone accused of a nonsense claim of crime like not wearing a seat belt or for not talking to a man with a gun who works for a corporation that lets him wear a uniform and push people around and make people talk to him that don't want to talk to him.
The chimp will win, it is life, it is it's own keeper of its life. It signed no contract to be held in captivity, it cannot be forced to receive a compelled benefit just because it does not speak their language.
When the chimp is freed, the people in prison who are not there of their free will and do not comprehend the language of court will be freed, and then when people find out there are other entities here [the so called disclosure they have begged for] they will not be held captive in FEMA camps or beheaded by guillotine for their workings behind the scene to keep us enslaved.
We will all live side by side, blacks, homosexuals, aliens, animals, refugees, border crossing illegals, religious fanatics, etc.

This is what we will have.
A New World in order and not in chaos.