Monday, July 13, 2015

Its not like you have not been told…

Its not like you have not been told…

by arnierosner
On Jul 12, 2015, at 7:41 PM, Kirk MacKenzie <kirk@silentnomorepublications.com> wrote:
Reference:

Agenda 21 and related items summary page

Here is how it is done…by deception:

US Corp National Franchise State and City Branches – Duns numbers

US Corp. and some Agencies Duns Numbers used to impersonate the lawful government of the American people.

Got a weak stomach…don’t click on this following link:

County Impostor Project

The Evidence is Irrefutable – Time to Arrest?

The United Colonies of America – Today

Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) Summary

From: Tom Zawistowski
Date: July 12, 2015
Subject: This week Obama TOOK OVER your City, Town, Village, County and Township AND YOU DIDN"T EVEN NOTICE! - PLEASE FORWARD
We the People Convention
P.O. Box 6211
Akron, OH 44312

n3fp_WTPCLogo_1.png
Ohio Hero's:
Northeast - Steve Berecek, David Frost, Peggy Reed, Kirsten Hill,
Southeast - Jon Eells, Brian Duffy
Southwest - Jennie Granato, Barbara Burkard
Central - Eileen DeRolf, Wendy Sizemore
Northwest - Linda Bishop, Boots Vandale, Jim Green, Rick Geyer
For YEARS this small band of Ohio Patriots, and a few others across the state, have been SCREAMING at all of us to recognize the PERSONAL THREAT of Agenda 21. Too few of us in our movement have listened, including me at times. Many outside our movement have attacked them publicly AND personally for exposing this hideous plan and how it will affect YOU personally. These people have worked TIRELESSLY, fighting Agenda 21 in Dayton and Fremont and Cleveland and everywhere they could. But because we have not supported them, because we have not listened to them, because we have not rallied to defend our own property rights their most dire warnings became reality this week - and you didn't even notice!
Attached to this email is a copy of the new "Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule" signed by our Communist President. READ EVERY WORD OF IT BECAUSE IT IS GOING TO CHANGE YOUR WORLD - LIKE IT OR NOT! Hard to believe, but this is actually worse than Obamacare. As usual, this is NOT about "Fair Housing" this is about redistribution of YOUR wealth, "equality of OUTCOMES" which is Communism, a Federal takeover of your local government's authority, and "State" control of where you live and how you and your children will be "allowed" to live.
Read the article below from National Review for the overview. YOU DON'T LIVE IN AMERICA ANYMORE. You live in the new "Peoples Republic" where there is no Constitution, there no "Representation" for you in Government, there is no rule of law, there is no equal protection under that law, our "words" mean what the "Statists" say they mean not what they were intended to mean.
What are you going to do about it? What are YOU going to do about it? Perhaps after reading the attached document you might finally go and personally confront you County Commissioners or Township Trustees or Mayor or City Council members and ask them if they understand how this THREATENS YOUR WAY OF LIFE. Perhaps you will finally get mad enough to use every resource at your disposal, every skill you possess, every ounce of your energy to throw these Communists and their supporter out of office. If you do not, they are going to take everything you've got and we will only have ourselves to blame. The time for talk if way over. Now YOU must act!
Tom Zawistowsk
President
Massive Government Overreach: Obama’s AFFH Rule Is Out
By Stanley Kurtz — July 8, 2015 (Online Link to this Article)
Today, HUD Secretary Julian Castro announced the finalization of the Obama administration’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Rule. A front-page article preemptively defending the move appears in today’s Washington Post. The final rule is 377 pages, vastly longer than the preliminary version of the rule promulgated in 2013.
AFFH is easily one of President Obama’s most radical initiatives, on a par with Obamacare in its transformative potential. In effect, AFFH gives the federal government a lever to re-engineer nearly every American neighborhood — imposing a preferred racial and ethnic composition, densifying housing, transportation, and business development in suburb and city alike, and weakening or casting aside the authority of local governments over core responsibilities, from zoning to transportation to education. Not only the policy but the political implications are immense — at the presidential, congressional, state, and local levels.
It is a scandal that the mainstream press has largely refused to report on AFFH until the day of its final release. The rule has been out in preliminary form for two years, and well before that the Obama administration’s transformative aims in urban/suburban policy were evident. Three years ago, when I wrote about Obama’s policy blueprint in Spreading the Wealth: How Obama Is Robbing the Suburbs to Pay for the Cities, the administration’s efforts to keep this issue under the radar were evident. Only last month, an admission of the stealth relied on by advocates to advance this initiative was caught on video.
Obama has downplayed his policy goals in this area and delayed the finalization of AFFH for years, because he understands how politically explosive this rule is. Once the true implications of AFFH are understood, Americans will rebel. The only prospect for successful imposition is a frog-boiling strategy of gradual intensification. The last day the frog will be able to jump is Tuesday, November 8, 2016.
Fundamentally, AFFH is an attempt to achieve economic integration. Race and ethnicity are being used as proxies for class, since these are the only hooks for social engineering provided by the Fair Housing Act of 1968. Like AFFH itself, today’s Washington Post piece blurs the distinction between race and class, conflating the persistence of “concentrated poverty” with housing discrimination by race. Not being able to afford a freestanding house in a bedroom suburb is no proof of racial discrimination. Erstwhile urbanites have been moving to rustic and spacious suburbs since Cicero built his villa outside Rome. Even in a monoracial and mono-ethnic world, suburbanites would zone to set limits on dense development.
Emily Badger’s piece in today’s Washington Post focuses on race, but the real story of AFFH is the attempt to force integration by class, to densify development in American suburbs and cities, and to undo America’s system of local government and replace it with a “regional” alternative that turns suburbs into helpless satellites of large cities. Once HUD gets its hooks into a municipality, no policy area is safe. Zoning, transportation, education, all of it risks slipping into the control of the federal government and the new, unelected regional bodies the feds will empower. Over time, AFFH could spell the end of the local democracy that Alexis de Tocqueville rightly saw as the foundation of America’s liberty and distinctiveness.
At this point, municipalities across the country need to seriously consider refraining from applying for Community Development Block Grants and other grant programs sponsored by HUD. Take one dollar of HUD money and you will be forced to submit to its demands, which can reach far beyond housing. Unfortunately, this is a highly imperfect solution, and not only because municipalities would be surrendering money taxed from their citizens’ pockets. The recent Supreme Court decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project has provided the federal government with a second club to use against municipalities seeking to escape HUD control. (See my piece on Inclusive Communities in the latest issue of National Review.) Ultimately, only a Republican president acting in concert with a Republican Congress can stymie AFFH and undo the damage of the Supreme Court’s recent housing decision.
This brings us to politics. As noted, AFFH is a largely unacknowledged attempt to force economic integration on every neighborhood in America. Yet in a recent Rasmussen poll, 83 percent of respondents said it was not the government’s job to diversify neighborhoods by income level, while only 8 percent say that this is an appropriate task for government. Now you know why the Obama administration and a compliant press corps have kept this initiative quiet.
It will take time to collect the data on which HUD’s new demands for local governments all over America will be based. While important enforcement will begin under the Obama administration, the major impact of AFFH will come under President Hillary Clinton, should she be elected. And Obama’s AFFH enforcer, Julian Castro, is widely touted as a likely vice-presidential running mate for Hillary. That means AFFH is going to be an issue in the next presidential campaign.
And the political implications go deeper still, to every level of government. Westchester County, New York, where AFFH has had a dry run of sorts, is now administered by Republican county executive Robert Astorino. Many forget that before the Obama administration tried to force Westchester County to cast aside its own zoning laws and build high-density, low-income housing at its own expense, Westchester was a liberal Democratic county run by liberal Democrats. After all, this is where Bill and Hillary Clinton live. At the local level, the Obama administration drove Westchester into the arms of the Republicans. The same thing could happen nationally, at every political level. But only if the frog wakes up and jumps by November of 2016. Even with AFFH now public, the Obama administration and the press corps will do everything in their power to obscure the real issues at stake in the massive AFFH power-grab. Don’t let that happen.
— Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. He can be reached at comments.kurtz@nationalreview.com.
arnierosner | July 12, 2015 at 8:11 pm | Categories: Civil Rights Violations | URL: http://wp.me/pZMlJ-6dt

No comments: