Wednesday, May 6, 2015

[rod-class] New Private Call - Recording of Monday's ITNJ Kickoff Call - 2015 PAG Training School




Posted by Freewill at 5:33:00 PM

2 comments:

snoop4truth said...

Rod Class (whose full name is "Rodney DALE Class") is the person who fraudulently impersonates a "retired federal judge" named "Judge DALE" in connection with FAKE LEGAL articles which reveal FAKE LEGAL information online.

In truth, Rodney DALE Class is an amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education who was NEVER a judge anywhere at anytime. Class peddles an AMATEUR BELIEF SYSTEM about the law that is an IMAGINARY ALTERNATIVE TO THE REAL LEGAL SYSTEM THAT IS ACTUALLY USED BY THE COURTS. The problem is that Class' AMATEUR BELIEF SYSTEM IS NOT REAL. It is entirely FAKE. This is the reason that Class has LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (39 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES AND STILL COUNTING).

Contrary to Class' claims, a "private attorney general" is not some type of fake, pretend, uneducated, unlicensed "attorney" who can represent others in court (using the amateur belief system about the law as a substitute for the real thing, or otherwise). Contrary to Class' claims, a "private attorney general" is not some type of lay person with special training and experience (in the amateur belief system about the law, or otherwise). A "private attorney general" is not an "attorney" at all.

If you would like to know the truth about what the courts say about Class' claims that he is a "private attorney general", then go to Google Scholar and look up: In Re Carl Pertuset; Vera Pertuset; Debotrs, 493 BR 232, Case No. 11-15607, United States bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division, Decided march 5, 2012 (Rodney DALE Class does not have a license to practice law and therefore may not represent persons in court even if he calls himself a "private attorney general"; there is nothing about the concept of a "private attorney general" that authorizes non-lawyers to represent others in court); In Re Carl Pertuset; Vera Pertuset; Debtors, No. 12-8014, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, 6th Circuit 2012, Decided December 18th, 2012 (same).

if you would like to know the truth about what the courts say when others claim to be "private attorneys general", then go to Google Scholar and look up: Malinay v. Nishimura, Civil No. 13-00372 SOM-KSC, United States District Court, D. Hawaii, August 14, 2013 (Anthony Williams is not licensed as an attorney and may not represent others in court even if he calls himself a "private attorney general", an "attorney in fact" or a "power of attorney", practicing law without a license is a misdemeanor); Wilfong v. Meeker, No. 5-12-CV-674-D, United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division, April 22, 2013 (Philip Carver, who claims to be a "private attorney general" under the Civil Rights Act Of 1866, is not licensed to practice law an may not assert a claim on behalf of anyone else, Caver's self-description as a "private attorney general" does not alter this analysis, there is nothing about the concept of a "private attorney general" that allows a non-lawyer to represent others in court, the unauthorized practice of law is illegal).

A "private attorney general" is a PARTY PLAINTIFF in a "public interest" CIVIL CASE who HIRES A REAL ATTORNEY WHO ACTUALLY WINS the case. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc., 390 U.S. 400 (1968)(a "private attorney general" is a public interest plaintiff, the purpose of the "private attorney general doctrine" is to relieve the winning plaintiff of the burden of having to pay his/her own attorney fees). The "private attorney general doctrine" achieves this result by forcing the LOSING DEFENDANT in a public interest civil case TO PAY the attorney fees of the WINNING PLAINITFF (the real "private attorney general"). Newman (above)

September 8, 2015 at 3:42 PM
snoop4truth said...

ABOUT ROD CLASS' PARTNER IN HIS LEGAL HOAXES (THE HOAXES OF DEBORAH TAVARES)

NOTE: The most complete information on the hoaxes of Deborah Tavares is in the 19th, 22nd, 3rd, 5th and 6th comments here in the following link. Read them. They are simply unbelievable! http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes. Below is a summary.

1. THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT HOAX: In this hoax, Tavares fraudulently claims that the "NASA War Document" is a "secret" or "leaked" government document which she claims "PROVES" that NASA is killing us all (or "PLANS" to kill us all) with horrific, futuristic high-tech weapons in furtherance of the "PLANNED" "extinction of mankind". But, this is not so. The original "NASA War Document" (before Tavares and her partner "MODIFIED" it to fit to the hoax) was a power point presentation which was used as a "visual aid" for an oral presentation that a NASA chief scientist gave at an August 13th-16th, 2001 CONVENTION in Orlando, Florida which was attended by THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN MILITARY CONTRACTORS who develop COUNTERMEASURES (defenses) to potential, theoretical, FUTURE, high-tech weapons that OTHER NATIONS could theoretically develop to use AGAINST the American people (as depicted in the original power point presentation). That means that the horrific, potential, FUTURE, high-tech weapons depicted in the original "NASA War document" WERE NOT weapons that NASA was using "AGAINST" the American people. Instead, they were horrific, potential, theoretical, FUTURE, high-tech weapons that the NASA chief scientist WAS URGING AMERICAN MILITARY CONTRACTORS TO DEVELOP COUNTERMEASURES AGAINST. The original power point presentation WAS NEVER POSTED ON ANY NASA WEBSITE. (So, contrary to Tavares' fraudulent claims, it was never "downloaded" or "leaked" from a NASA website). Instead, the original power point presentation was actually POSTED IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (without security) on the "Department of DEFENSE Technical INFORMATION Center" website (A PUBLIC WEBSITE) a month BEFORE the 2001 convention at which the NASA chief scientist was scheduled to speak. IT WAS NEVER POSTED ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE WEB. Proof of all the foregoing is provided in the links inside the 19th comment here. http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?99447-Rod-Class-his-many-hoaxes.

THE NASA WAR DOCUMENT "CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS" TEST: Do you think that, in principle, it is a good idea for a NASA chief scientist (who has detailed, technological knowledge of potential, theoretical, FUTURE, high-tech weapons that OTHER NATIONS could potentially develop for use AGAINST the American people) TO INFORM American military contractors about such potential, theoretical, FUTURE threats and TO URGE them to develop COUNTERMEASURES against them? In the year 2001, what would have been the best way for NASA's chief scientist to reach thousands of American military contractors TO INFORM them of such potential, theoretical, FUTURE threats and TO URGE them to develop COUNTERMEASURES against them (a national convention of American military contractors perhaps)? Assuming that a NASA chief Scientist was asked to speak at a national convention of such American military contractors and assuming that the whole focus (and theme) of the convention was potential, theoretical, FUTURE, high-tech weapons that OTHER NATIONS could theoretically develop for use against the American people in the FUTURE, do you think that it would be a good idea, in principle, for that NASA chief scientist to prepare a VISUAL AID (like a power point presentation reflecting technical CONCEPTS and DRAWINGS) to use at the convention to VISUALLY ILLUSTRATE such potential, theoretical, FUTURE threats to those in attendance (GIVEN THAT MOST SUCH POTENTIAL, THEORETICAL, FUTURE THREATS DID NOT EXIST IN 2001 TO BE VISUALLY DEPICTED BY PHOTOGRAPHS)?

March 17, 2018 at 9:33 PM

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)