Wednesday, April 22, 2015

JPMORGAN CHASE BANS STORAGE OF CASH IN ITS SAFETY DEPOSIT BOXES

JPMORGAN CHASE BANS STORAGE OF CASH IN ITS SAFETY DEPOSIT BOXES

War on cash intensifies
Report: JPMorgan Chase Bans Storage of Cash in its Safety Deposit Boxes

 JPMorgan Chase customers are receiving letters informing them that the bank will no longer allow cash to be stored in safety deposit boxes.
The content of a post over on the Collectors Universe message board suggests that we may be about to see a resurgence of the old fashioned method of stuffing bank notes under the mattress.
My mother has a SDB at a Chase branch with one of my siblings as co-signers. Last week they got a letter outlining a number of changes to the lease agreement, including this:
“Contents of the box: You agree not to store any cash or coins other than those found to have a collectible value.”
Another change is that signatures will no longer be accepted to access the box. The next time they go in they have to bring two forms of ID and they will be issued a four-digit pin number that will be used to access the box then and in the future.
The letter, entitled “Updated Safe Deposit Box Lease Agreement,” was sent out to customers at the beginning of the month.
“Hide your wallets, the banksters are on the move,” warns the Economic Policy Journal.
As of last month, Chase has also instituted a new policy which, “restricts borrowers from using cash to make payments on credit cards, mortgages, equity lines, and auto loans,” writes Professor Joseph Salerno of the Mises Institute.
The news arrives on the back of comments by Citi’s Willem Buiter, who recently advocated abolishing cash altogether in order to “solve the world’s central banks’ problem with negative interest rates”.
Last month we also reported on how the Justice Department is ordering bank employees to consider calling the cops on customers who withdraw $5,000 dollars or more.
Efforts to impose restrictions on the use of cash by banks are seen by many as an attack on anonymity and an example of how financial institutions are positioning themselves to handle the fallout of the next economic crash – at the expense of customers.
According to reports which emerged last year, HSBC is now interrogating its account holders in the UK on how they earn and spend their money as well as restricting large cash withdrawals for customers from £5000 upwards.
Banks in the U.S. are also making it harder for customers to withdraw and deposit cash, with Chase imposing new capital controls that mandate identification for cash deposits and ban cash being deposited into another person’s account.
In October 2013, we also covered policy changes instituted by Chase which banned international wire transfers while restricting cash activity for business customers (both deposits and withdrawals) to a $50,000 limit per statement cycle.
Last month, French Finance Minister Michel Sapin hailed the introduction of measures set to come into force in September which will restrict French citizens from making cash payments over €1,000 euros.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Anyone who is so inclined (and know what they are doing) can challenge most of this. One item in particular is the payment of credit card or other bills using cash. As long as cash is an "accepted form of payment", according to the Bills of Exchange Act 1882, (this does apply anywhere, by the way) if a legal and valid payment is tendered in payment of a debt and *is refused* then the debt is to be marked as satisfied and nothing more will be "owed" on it any more. There is case precedence for this. I will have to go find them again, but with this precedent in place, JPMC has no grounds to deny you the ability to "pay" a credit card bill with cash. Otherwise, and this is the kicker, if you walked in and offered to pay the whole amount in cash and they refused (get it in writing) then the debt just disappears because they rejected your legal and valid form of payment.

Research it out. . . Wish I could remember some of the cases. . there are actually *MANY* along this line.

DS

Popeye said...

IF THE PEOPLE ARE SO INCLINED TO KEEP THEIR MONEY IN THE JP MORGAN REFER (SO TO SPEAK) THEY DESERVE TO HAVE THESE CROOKS STEAL IT AS THAT IS WHAT BANKS ARE ON ABOUT....THEY ARE........ALL.......CROOKS....KAPISH??

Anonymous said...

How exactly would they know you had cash in your safe deposit box, outside of them physically accessing your box either in your absence, or standing there inspecting the contents when you open it? Are they hiring Safe Deposit Box Police? Ooops...maybe I shouldn't have said that...might give them ideas...lol.
Not long ago, I inquired at a local bank, not associated with JP Morgan as far as I know, and separate from my own bank, about opening a safe deposit box. In the course of my inquiry, I mentioned about having cash stored in the box. I do not recall what her exact response was, but it was basically "it's up to you, not going to tell you you can or can't".

Anonymous said...

Because they have cameras up everywhere surveilling everybody RIGHT!!!!

Anonymous said...

Re:1:57 P.M.
Wake up and smell the chamber pot what ever was left of the rule of law went out with the contents of the pot whenever Frank Marshal Davis jr.(AKA Barak Obama) was unlawfully placed in the Oval Office. People like you are going to carry your paper work and affidavits into the fema camp with you.

Anonymous said...

Most likely a fabricated story.