The following from Jimstonefreelance.com-----" Every report on this web site is public domain and can be re-posted in full. Just mention this web site by linking back to the original here."
18 feb 2015
Watch for assassination of Sudan's President
The day after President Al-Bashir made the claim that the CIA and Mossad are running ISIS and Boko Haram, the exact press runs that would have reported this were seized from Sudan's 16 top newspapers and destroyed before they could be distributed. It is fairly obvious that their publishing this was the reason for the seizure, and the fact it happened makes a huge point:
Someone is in control of the Sudanese police
forces other than the President. Someone gave the order to stop the
message about what President Al Bashir said.
The details:
During an interview on Euronews which took place on
Feb 17, Sudan's President stated in very clear terms that the CIA and
Israel's Mossad are behind the Islamist militant groups Boko Haram and
Isis. He went on to reference the Isis beheadings of 21 coptic
christians in Libya and said that no Muslim group would ever do that. He
is right. However, if all the newspapers that would have gotten his
message out to the Sudanese people were seized before they could report his saying this, he is not in full control of the country and is probably in serious danger.
This morning, The Sudanese
National Intelligence and Security Service seized copies of 16 daily
newspapers, which included Al-Tayar, Al-Rai al-Aam, Al-Intibaha, Akhir
Lahza, Al-Ahram al-Youm, Awal al-Nahar, Al-Watan, Al-Sudani, Alwan,
Al-Saiha, Al-Mijhar al-Siyasi, Al-Dar, and Hikayat. I have obviously never heard of these, but they were, according to reports, the largest papers in the country.
Most
likely Sudan is half controlled by the CIA and Mossad, and they
censored the President via force. If they saw fit to take action of this
sort, they will be very likely to discipline Al-Bashir by killing him.
With all the remote control options in cars, planes and trains available
to them now, they will not need to use a bullet. It is called plausible deniability . . . .
Cia headquarters shut down?
There were numerous reports that the
CIA had abandoned their world headquarters in Langley Virginia. Last
night I could not find anything to the contrary and found many posts
about a deal being made with China to shut them down, them being busted
for faking ISIS so they were shut down for cleaning of staff, etc and unfortunately, this morning I finally found the real reason.
They never shut down at all. It was a hoax. Here is what happened to provide a pretext for the hoax -
A bunch of Iranian students went to
the gates of the CIA world headquarters to protest drone strikes and the
use of drones. It was a peaceful protest. But the police still taped
off the entrances which made a great photo op for a hoaxer after the students left.
In the hoax photos no one is there, and it really does look taped off
and abandoned. But if you look up that drone protest, you will see it is
the same entrance, the same tape, the same everything and sadly, the CIA did not shut down.
Nuke in Ukraine? I am undecided, but there is some really odd stuff with this
I think it was a fuel air bomb. And I think all the
stats on fuel air bombs are faked and censored now. Off the top of my
head, this is what I (think) I know - when the U.S. attacked
Afghanistan, there were numerous caves they wanted purged and their
choice for purging the caves was a polystyrene fuel air bomb. These
affected the seismographs worldwide, triggering numerous earthquake
readings in the 2.5 - 4.5 range.
So I know
that when all I can find now is references to fuel air bombs only
achieving a 5 ton yield, they are completely bogus. This got censored.
Remember the movie Outbreak? One bomb does a
whole city? You won't get that from a five ton bomb. If memory serves me
right, fuel air bombs are in fact capable of reaching half a kiloton
yield. They were called "poor man's nukes" for a reason.
Now onto Ukraine and that nuke. People on the ground there said that whatever caused the blast had a 500 ton yield. Simultaneously
with this blast, the USGS logged a 6.8 seismic reading where it went
off, (which they quickly purged from their records, good people they
are) but it at least stayed visible for 20 minutes on the USGS web site.
A seismic reading of 6.8 from one station does not mean a 6.8 earthquake happened if no surrounding stations register much. But
what it does mean is that something absolutely huge happened in the
immediate vicinity of the station that shook that much, and a fuel air
bomb/nuke fits that scenario perfectly.
So I dug into this, and made note of two things -
the first is the color of the blast, which does not match a nuke. The
second is the sound of the blast, which was that of a gas explosion,
which a fuel air bomb would sound like on steroids. Then there was a photograph
shot at exactly the right time, and you can see the ignition sequence,
where the flames start from a small point above the main explosion, and
then have a huge fireball attached to them. A nuke would not look like
that.
I am fairly confident it was a fuel air bomb in
Ukraine. Recently there was a huge gas explosion in Mexico City which
involved the fuel air ignition of 10,000 pounds of butane. That sounded
exactly like the audio of the blast in Ukraine. There is body, punch and
roar to an open air gas explosion because such explosions have a blast
wave that is below the speed of sound. The syria nuke and high velocity
explosives have a totally different sound, they have an extremely sharp
cracking noise that is very short when they go off because the blast
coming off of them is super sonic, so the entire blast wave is sonically
bunched up and all arrives to a distant observer at the same time.
Sound cannot outrun itself, but it can bunch up on itself and all arrive
at once. The sound alone can tell you what type of explosion happened.
So I think it was a fuel air bomb in Ukraine (go to Youtube and compare blast sounds between gas explosions and high velocity explosives) the difference is obvious.
All of the above really does not matter much, because if the blast was that big it was probably an American bomb that did it. I guess Ukraine has similar stuff, but in the case of the fuel air bomb scenario, I doubt anything Ukraine has would work. I think that particular blast was out sourced.
West coast port closures meaningless . . . .
I did not know it was possible to do
so easily, but all the ships are simply hitting the Panama Canal and
Suez canal and now the port of Houston and the East Coast is booming.
Though the West Coast imports are down by 29 percent, overall imports
are only down by 11 percent and the situation is recovering rapidly now
that East Coast ports are picking up the slack. No doubt many imports
will simply hit the Atlantic now rather than the Pacific.
No comments:
Post a Comment