Vaccine-autism
connection: US Congressman stonewalled by CDC, by Jon Rappoport, August
21, 2014
With a CDC
whistleblower standing in the shadows, claiming the CDC has known about the
vaccine-autism connection for 10 years, the cover-up is threatening to blow
sky-high.
And now Florida
Congressman Bill Posey has sent me a statement about his experience with the
CDC.
Posey has been
trying to obtain specific data about a 2004 CDC study which claimed the MMR
(measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine has no role in causing autism.
The CDC
whistleblower (so far, anonymously) has been pointing to that 2004 study as a
fraud, claiming vital data were omitted, data which would indict the vaccine.
So how has the CDC
responded to Posey’s inquiry and request for all the 2004 data?
Here is what he
wrote to me:
“The CDC has
refused for more than six months to hand over documents I requested concerning
this issue. That is not the type of response we expect from our government.”
What??
A US Congressman
wants research data from a federal agency and they flat-out refuse.
Nothing much is a
stake here—only the health of the entire US population. Vaccines causing
autism? And the CDC has the right to keep as many secrets as it wants to?
Did the CDC wake up
one morning and decide it’s the CIA? On what grounds is it refusing to release
the data? National Security?
Here is what the
CDC whistleblower (a research scientist still employed by the CDC) states: intentionally
omitted data from the 2004 study shows that: African-American boys who receive
their first MMR vaccine before the age of 36 months have a 300% increased risk
of developing autism.
Presumably, this is
what Congressman Posey would learn if the CDC turned over the data to him.
And who knows what
else he would learn?
My comment about
the CDC thinking it’s the CIA isn’t entirely facetious. In 1987, I confirmed
that, routinely, certain CDC employees are sent to Langley, Virginia, for CIA
training, and return with top-secret classifications—meaning they can access
data that are off-limits to the rest of the CDC and most of the federal
government.
Data confirming
extensive and ongoing damage caused by vaccines might indeed rate as
“classified, National Security,” if by Security you mean “protecting vaccine
manufacturers and their government allies.”
As opposed to
protecting the public.
Jon Rappoport
No comments:
Post a Comment