FROM JIM STONE

SENT USING THE LATEST VERSION OF THE TOR BROWSER

August 6 2014

Ebola spread rate at current trend

Mar, 2014 - Infected: 104 Dead: 62
Apr, 2014 - Infected: 194 Dead: 116
May, 2014 - Infected: 360 Dead: 216
Jun, 2014 - Infected: 670 Dead: 402
Jul, 2014 - Infected: 1,247 Dead: 748
Aug, 2014 - Infected: 2,319 Dead: 1,391
Sep, 2014 - Infected: 4,313 Dead: 2,588
Oct, 2014 - Infected: 8,022 Dead: 4,813
Nov, 2014 - Infected: 14,921 Dead: 8,953
Dec, 2014 - Infected: 27,753 Dead: 16,652
Jan, 2015 - Infected: 51,621 Dead: 30,973
Feb, 2015 - Infected: 96,016 Dead: 57,610
Mar, 2015 - Infected: 178,590 Dead: 107,154
Apr, 2015 - Infected: 332,177 Dead: 199,306
May, 2015 - Infected: 617,849 Dead: 370,709
Jun, 2015 - Infected: 1,149,199 Dead: 689,519
Jul, 2015 - Infected: 2,137,510 Dead: 1,282,506
Aug, 2015 - Infected: 3,975,768 Dead: 2,385,461
Sep, 2015 - Infected: 7,394,928 Dead: 4,436,957
Oct, 2015 - Infected: 13,754,567 Dead: 8,252,740
Nov, 2015 - Infected: 25,583,494 Dead: 15,350,096
Dec, 2015 - Infected: 47,585,299 Dead: 28,551,179
Jan, 2016 - Infected: 88,508,656 Dead: 53,105,193
Feb, 2016 - Infected: 164,626,099 Dead: 98,775,660
Mar, 2016 - Infected: 306,204,545 Dead: 183,722,727
Apr, 2016 - Infected: 569,540,453 Dead: 341,724,272
May, 2016 - Infected: 1,059,345,243 Dead: 635,607,146
Jun, 2016 - Infected: 1,970,382,153 Dead: 1,182,229,292
Jul, 2016 - Infected: 3,664,910,804 Dead: 2,198,946,482
Aug, 2016 - Infected: 6,816,734,096 Dead: 4,090,040,457

It would not be a bad idea at all to get a big 500 pill bottle of 1000 milligram vitamin C NOW, though it is doubtful this ebola trend will continue at its current rate, VITAMIN C IS CHEAP AND GOOD TO HAVE AROUND ANYWAY.
I cannot help but think that the many countries that have tried to ban the sale of vitamins without a prescription may have been convinced to do so in preparation for this, in any country that has done this the population will be doomed if vitamin C really is the treatment for ebola.

Once again, I believe the ultra high dosages will not be needed. Max benefit is very likely to be achieved at 12 grams per day, with each 1000 milligram tablet taken at two hour intervals, and a few in the morning (all the ones you skipped while sleeping.) It is probably pointless to take more than that for preventive purposes (but obviously at least double that amount if you do come down with ebola).

An anonymous nurse posted the following to a forum:

The human population of this world has always been kept in check by viruses, or some other method of sheer destruction. The Flu, Polio, Smallpox, you name it, these things have a purpose in nature. They keep populations under control.

Since the dawn of the industrial age we began to outsmart them all. We Vaccinate against the flu, we all but eradicated Polio in this country. We had beaten our enemies into near submission, and as a result, the worlds population has exploded. But our Genius is beginning to catch up with us. Anti-biotic resistant bacteria are on the rise, the flu is devising new ways to counter attack our defenses. And Ebola, well, lets just say it's doing what all viruses do. It's trying to survive, it's trying to find a way to use our own immune system against us. Think about this for a minute...
The Flu infects you, your body goes into defensive mode, realizing that it must expel the invader. So your own body fills your lungs with mucus and fluid, which forces you to cough. This is the real genius of the flu. It actually depends on your immune response to spread itself. And it doesn't have much time to do it either. Because your body begins to increase it's own temperature. Yes, having a fever is an immune response, not caused by the flu, rather it is literally your body attempting to make you so hot that the protein coat protecting the flu virus breaks down, allowing your white cells to attack.
This is what all viruses do. ALL of them. They find a way to exploit your natural immune responses to propagate themselves.
Ebola.... once just a hemorrhagic fever on steroids, now is a bona-fide menace. I work in a hospital laboratory at a major hospital in a major Metro Area. My wife works clinical micro for the same company. I'm very well versed in just about everything a STAT lab in a hospital can, and does do. My wife on the other hand, actually majored in micro, with emphasis on virology. So I wanted you all to know a few things about this outbreak that became apparent to us as it began to spread.
#1. Something has changed. This virus used to have a much shorter incubation period. And it would kill within a week. The mortality rate was much higher once upon a time. However, this is not the case anymore. Based on the sheer number of infected, the virus it seems, may have found a way to transmit itself easier. Typically when a virus "evolves" it gains in one area, while giving ground in another. It makes sense to me that Ebola gave up alot of it's lethality, for the ability to spread itself easier, and incubate much, much longer.
#2. Africa is a mess. There is no way to tell how many are infected. Once upon a time Ebola would strike a village and wipe everyone out, and that was it. It would kill so fast that it could not spread out of the hotzone. Because of what I said above that is not the case anymore. On a continent where borders still mean very little to the native population, it is a scary mix. Even if the CDC or the WHO wanted to get accurate numbers, it would be hopeless due to the unknown number or people that distrust western medicine, refuse to get help, or wander around from village to village. The infrastructure simply does not have the same capabilities we do in the west.
#3. Even in the United States, out of all the various hospitals I have worked at, there is no hope of containing anything like this. One of the largest hospitals I worked at only had two reverse flow isolation rooms. [b]TWO[/b], let that sink in for a minute. If this thing goes as bad as some think it will, we are, quite literally, screwed. Patients only show up to the hospital when they go symptomatic. So by the time they get there, they've already infected their entire family, their work group, and anyone they got within a few feet of on the way to the hospital. When they get there the ER nurses would treat it either like Flu, or Sepsis. But the whole time the patient is infecting all of them. And all of them, in turn, begin to infect everyone else in the exact same way. If this is as virulent as the WHO thinks it might be, by the time people realize what is going on, there will be more sick people than there would be beds available at every hospital in the US combined.
#4. Testing blood for anything is not as simple as looking under a microscope. And hospital labs are not set up for exotic virology. We run basic Chemistries, Cardiac enzymes, blood counts, sed rates, drug levels, bacterial cultures, all the basic hands on shit. The kind of things that old people usually present for, blood loss, infection, and cardiac events. Anything exotic gets sent out. Sometimes to the State lab, most of the time specimens get sent across the country to Quest Diagnostics, or to other organizations actually set up for it. Your average city hospital is pitifully, laughably, not ready for anything of this nature. Sure, running a CBC can tell if you are dehydrated, it can tell of you are loosing blood, it can tell if you are fighting "something" off. It just can't tell what. A sed rate can determine if you have excess inflammation, but it can't tell you why. A Lactic Acid level can indicate Sepsis, but it can't tell you from what. The point is, at the early stages of an outbreak, people will get treated for run of the mill things. Because nothing a hospital can test immediately will be able to tell anyone that you are carrying the most deadly hemorrhagic fever currently known. Honestly, if a person came into a busy ER with a fever, the triage nurse would put them in the waiting room until a non urgent room opened up in the back. They simply have no way to know who is carrying what.
I'm not saying we're all gonna die. This thing could fizzle out. And everything could be fine. What I am trying to illustrate here is that just because a lab exists in a hospital, does not mean that it can tell you everything. There are triage algorithms that work for everyday field medicine, but nothing for an outbreak. Thinking that living in a developed nation will curb the spread is ridiculous. If anything, it makes it worse. Our commute, our workplaces, our homes, our methods of entertainment, all of those things that we love so much about living in the the west, are the things that viruses depend on to spread.
If this virus truly has found a way to transmit easier, the healthcare system would be completely overloaded with something they simply can not handle.
Anyway, I'm not trying to scare anyone, I just hope people can be realistic about the capabilities of hospital containment, hospital laboratory testing, and the fact that the healthcare system, in ANY country, could not handle a massive outbreak.
So don't expect miracles from front line hospital staff, we don't have the tools, and we certainly do not have the manpower. Ask anyone in the medical field how much overtime they could work if they felt like it, don't even get me started on how thinly stretched people in the industry are. Though I suppose if this does turn into something, that will become apparent very, very fast.
Good luck, don't freak out, wash your hands, be prepared, hug your kids.
That is all.

Full analysis: Smallest toy rocket on market used for "Hamas rocket launch" newscast

Rockets ARE being fired at Israel, but it is not Hamas doing it and the Hamas rocket launch video proves it. The real rockets are false flag attacks being done by Israel against Israel to justify leveling the Gaza strip so Israel can annex it.

Yesterday the Hindu press did a supposed broadcast of a hamas rocket launch, which "proves" those who are saying Hamas has no rockets are in error. But I knew there was something wrong with that video, (mainly the complete absence of any visible rocket) but there was more to it than that and last night I pondered and connected all the dots.

First and foremost, the most obvious points to be made are the fact that the types of rockets "Hamas" uses, even according to the IDF, are completely unguided and brainless point and hope rockets THAT WEIGH A MINIMUM OF 70 POUNDS and up to 130 pounds that need a guide rail to be launched. And the fact that guide rail is missing in the video is where they can be nailed in their fraud of this supposed "Hamas" rocket launch, and have it easily be proven that the rocket HAD TO have been a tiny three ounce rocket a 10 year old would buy at a toy store, over stuffed with a G sized engine that can lift a pound (to make the smoke) and has no military potential whatsoever.

How can it be proven that the rocket was a three ounce toy with an over sized motor as stated above?

Simple. Super small rockets of the type launched by 10 year olds take off so quickly that the wind hits the back fins and keeps the rocket straight before the rocket has a chance to pivot sideways and take a random course. This eliminates the need for a guide rail. Larger rockets which lack any guidance system (which would be true of any Hamas rocket as claimed by Israel) need to have a guide rail to keep them going straight until they get enough speed for wind to hit the back fins and keep them straight. And by larger, this means any rocket which weighs more than a can of soda pop and lacks an electronic controlled guidance system.

In the supposed "hamas rocket launch" video, the rocket is never seen, because it is too small to be seen, and additionally there is no guide rail for it in the video, which for a rocket of the type Israel claims Hamas is launching, would have been too long to even fit under the tent and OBVIOUSLY VISIBLE in the video. In the image to the left, a TWO POUND toy rocket is loaded onto its guide rail. This one is big enough to need certification. How big would the guide rail be for a 70 pound rocket?
The excess smoke seen in the video was the result of putting an over sized G scale engine in a small toy. ALL TOY ROCKETS HAVE IGNITION WIRES OF THE TYPE SEEN IN THE HAMAS ROCKET LAUNCH VIDEO, ANOTHER RED FLAG.

Where is the massive 70 pound rocket and guide rail in this screen capture to the left?

To sum it up, a PSY OP ROCKET LAUNCH of a souped up toy designed for a 10 year old that could hide behind that water tank justifies making 500,000 people homeless and killing thousands, THAT is the way the Jews do business, remember, the motto of the Mossad is "by way of deception thou shalt do war", THE FACT THEY FAKED THIS VIDEO WITH A TOY PROVES HAMAS HAS NO ROCKETS, And if they now produce something else showing something real, THAT will be fake too, once anyone screws up like this there is no going back. And another salient point - the lack of a guide rail in ANY of the psy op photos of Hamas rockets proves they are all fake, unguided rockets CANNOT LAUNCH WITHOUT ONE which means EVERY HAMAS ROCKET PHOTO OUT THERE IS FAKE, a point I overlooked myself.

And there is yet another huge laughable error in the video

IF In Israel's own words, the smallest rocket Hamas has weighs 70 pounds, the launch of a MINIMUM 70 pound rocket would have blown the man's guts out if he was stupid enough to stand behind it while setting it off the way the video showed, what he did was risky for even a large one pound G scale toy. There are so many things wrong with the video it won't pass muster with those who have even the most limited technical knowledge. Now, WHY DID ISRAEL FAKE THIS FOR THE CAMERAS?