Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: Video: INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF COURT
All very good points however, if you refuse to contract with them,
there is no need for Court.............. Everything Robb
writes about
requires accepting the offer to contract !!!!!!!!!! Remember:
I DO NOT ACCEPT THIS
OFFER TO CONTRACT AND
I DO NOT CONSENT TO THESE
PROCEEDINGS !!!!!
D~
From: Jim Bolton <jbolton7@cfl.rr.com>
To: Undisclosed-Recipient@
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 4:12 PM
Subject: Video: INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF COURT
To: Undisclosed-Recipient@
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2014 4:12 PM
Subject: Video: INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF COURT
----- Original Message -----
From: courtofrecord@aol.com
Sent: Saturday, January 18,
2014 10:03 PM
Subject: Video: INDIRECT
CONTEMPT OF COURT
RobbRyder here : Video:
INDIRECT CONTEMPT OF COURT
A wise man once said “
an attorney is an officer of the court and always considered in court” (now
if I could just remember who said it.. Blackstone or Coke)
……….
An attorney is in
contempt of court if he brings fraud upon the court… such as bringing
suit in the name of a Fictitious Plaintiff :
Fictitious plaintiff.
A person appearing in the writ, complaint, or
record as the plaintiff in a suit, but who in reality does not exist, or who is
ignorant of the suit and of the use of his name in it.
It is a contempt of court to sue in the name of a fictitious
party.
The Plaintiff in a foreclosure IS NOT THE BANK
The “Plaintiff” is a non-existent entity as there is no
Certificate of Good Standing or existence filed with the Sec of State
office.. “The Plaintiff” is just a bunch of letters grouped to look like
the name of a Bank…
The Plaintiff is a
Fictitious Plaintiff and the Attorney of Record has brought fraud upon
the court by representing a fictitious Plaintiff….. or so it would seem….
Want to find out… then follow the easy steps used to ask for a
Contempt of Court hearing… an ex parte motion with a verified affidavit
submitted to the court via the Court Administrator…
Another example: The fact that there isn’t a sworn complaint in
criminal cases… (assuming you didn’t assault someone)… that is fraud upon
the court and reason for a contempt of court hearing.. (and more)..
These situations are considered “Indirect Contempt of Court” and
require action on your part for the Court to “see” the contempt..
The immediate view and
presence does not extend beyond the range of vision of the judge, and the term applies only to such contempts as
are committed in the face of the court. …………
All other alleged
contempts depend solely upon evidence, and are inferences from fact, and the foundation
for the proceedings to punish therefor must be laid by affidavit
indirect contempt and initiation of
contempt proceedings required that “the misconduct which is alleged to constitute the contempt [be] proved to the
satisfaction of the court by affidavit.”
In cases of indirect
contempt, absent a sufficient affidavit,
jurisdiction
over the alleged
contemnor does not attach.
See also In re Collins, 329 Mich 192, 196 (1950) (filing of false pleadings may not be summarily
punished)
“Criminal contempt is a crime in the ordinary sense; it is a violation of the law, a public
wrong which is punishable by fine or imprisonment or both. . .
In a criminal contempt proceeding, because the
penalty is unconditional, fixed, and imposed as punishment for past misconduct, the
contemnor does not have the ability to purge himself or herself of the
contempt.
(2) A peace officer who, knowing the statement is false, makes a
materially false statement in a complaint signed under subsection (1) is
guilty of perjury, a felony punishable by imprisonment for not
more than 15 years, and in addition, is in contempt of court.
13-3899. Complaint need not be verified
A. Complaints
stating misdemeanor charges laid before a magistrate under the provisions of
section 13‑3898, or filed with the magistrate under the provisions of section 13‑3903
need not be sworn to if they contain a form of certification by the arresting
officer in substance as follows:
"I hereby certify that I have reasonable grounds to believe and
do believe that the person cited herein committed the offense described herein
contrary to law."
B. A false certification under the provisions of
subsection A of this section shall constitute perjury
All the above in more
detail along with a few short stories about lis pendens, Certificate of
Pendency, election precincts and related topics…
If you can help keep the lights on:
ashleyrytlewski@gmail.com (paypal)
and thank you in advance.
RobbRyder:
courtofrecord@aol.com
You can find my other research at:
http://robcourtofrecord.wordpress.com
On youtube at: Robbbryder ( 3 b's)
Gospel of Thomas:
11 Jesus said, "This heaven will pass away, and the one above it will pass
away. The dead are not alive, and the living will not die. During the days
when you ate what is dead, you made it come alive. When you are in the
light, what will you do? 0n the day when you were one, you became two. But
when you become two, what will you do?"
No comments:
Post a Comment