Demand United States notes “Lawful Money!” Common-Law Remedy

Demand United States notes “Lawful Money!” 

Common-Law Remedy Long Live The Republic

Since HJR-192 has been repealed “People” can refuse to be paid in anything less than “Lawful Money.”

See: http://youtu.be/DU6fxC5CXMg

Since HJR-192 has been repealed (1982). “People” can refuse to be paid in anything less than “lawful money.” Once the “People” refuse to accept anything less than “lawful money” the banks are placed in a most difficult position. “Lawfully” the banks “must” pay in “lawful money.” It’s more likely than not that the banks don’t have “lawful money” or maybe not enough to fulfill said transaction request, which translates the banks are insolvent, also known as bankrupt!

Federal Reserve notes are proof of the "Bank Holiday" declared by President Roosevelt in 1933. United States notes were in circulation at the time of the President's "Declaration in 1933."

Federal Reserve notes (debt currency) v. United States notes “Lawful Money” (debt-free)

By demanding United States notes “Lawful Money” at the time of cashing any paycheck, you’re avoiding the taxable event:

Redeemed in lawful money Pursuant to 12 USC 411:

True Name: d/b/a/ TRADE NAME (FICTION)

You’re avoiding the activity — or the verb — of endorsement. [restrictive endorsement because it 'restricts' how the bank may negotiate the instrument.]

What this means thirty-two years later. During the time when HJR-192 supposedly was “law” Americans had no resort to the common-law remedies which had been available whenever there had been a breach of contract (obligation) which required payment in a particular kind of coin or currency (or maybe, commodity). The “law” pursuant to HJR-192 set aside or “suspended” the common-law in regards to payments of contracts in money, or as it might be said in another way, HJR-192 was very much a bank’s delight because it effectuated a “suspension of redemption” of all of the outstanding circulating notes as well as newly created “legal” ability to “negotiate” checks and other money, denominated securities without having to pay out lawful money, meaning gold or silver coin. Instead the banks could discharge their fiduciary duty by offering that is “tendering” anything that was legal tender at that time.

Please take note HJR-192 did not by express terms repeal any pre-existing common-law remedies. At most, it indirectly suspended the ability to use common-law remedies for a while. The while lasted from 1933 to 1982 almost 50 years. Upon repeal of HJR-192 “all” of the older common-law remedies became available again and the banks could not “legally” evade their “fiduciary duty” to pay in “lawful money.” Banks have continued to avoid their duty (obligation) it seems because the “People” have not demanded that banks pay in dollars of “lawful money” and refused to accept anything less including Federal Reserve notes when tendered.  

Congress has the power to abolish the Federal Reserve System destroying the private credit system. However, the people have it within their power to strip the Fed of its powers, rescind private credit and get the bankers to pay off the National Debt should Congress fail to act.

Anyone can present Federal Reserve notes to any Federal Reserve Bank and demand redemption in public money — i.e. legal tender United States notes and coins. A Federal Reserve note is a fixed obligation or evidence of indebtedness which pledges redemption (12 USC 411) in public money to the note holder.

The Fed maintain a ready supply of United States notes in hundred dollar denominations for redemption purposes should it be required, and coins are available to satisfy claims for smaller amounts. However, should the general public decide to redeem large amounts of private credit for public money, a financial melt-down within the Fed would quickly occur.

See:  http://www.scribd.com/doc/197403700/Federal-Reserve-Notes-Private-Script-v-United-States-Notes-Public-Money