Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Media Blackout? Obama’s Supreme Court Hearing Was Friday – Decision On Tuesday

Media Blackout? Obama’s Supreme Court Hearing Was Friday – Decision On Tuesday

February 17, 2013 by 
For all the ridiculous stories that are pumped through the media airways, one would think they could at least squeeze THIS story in somewhere?  We are talking about the President of the United States of America, the Full Supreme Court, and completewith possible involvement of the CIA nominee John Brennan, and no one in our pathetic media feels this is news worthy?
“Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Hon. John Roberts has scheduled to hear a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the United States Full Supreme Court.”
The Hon. John Roberts, Chief Justice has scheduled to hear case regarding Obama’s forged IDs in conference before the Full Supreme Court

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, the Hon. John Roberts has scheduled to hear a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the United States Full Supreme Court.
Congressional Petition has been posted online replacing the Taitz petition that was removed from WhiteHouse.GOV. This new Congressional Petition has taken on a life of its own!
The birther case became less a source of entertainment when New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi suggested that the president’s nominee to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, may have played a role in removing birther evidence fromBarack Obama‘s passport records.
It appears that in 2008, a State Department insider was simultaneously employed by Analysis Corporation of McLean, Va. (then headed by Mr. Brennan) and was reprimanded for accessing (and possibly altering) Obama’s passport records.
It is likely that the overwhelming information coming from credible parties cannot be ignored any longer and it might be the reason behind the decision by the Hon. Chief Justice John Roberts to grant Taitz a full Supreme Court Conference on February 15, 2013. This story will be updated as the events evolve.
The case titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Securitynumber 042-68-4425 which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS.
Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.Please, keep in mind, Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in, but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate.
We cannot forget that over 30 high ranking officials of Nixon administration including Attorney General of the United States and White House Counsel were indicted, convicted and subsequently wound up in prison. According to Orly Taitz, Obama Forgery gate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate.
More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia and possibly still a citizen of Kenya Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social security number SCOTUS printout is below.
No. 12A606 Title: Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v.Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State Docketed: December 13, 2012
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of California Case Nos.: (S207078) Proceedings and Orders Dec 11 2012
Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012 Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012 Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013 Application (12A606) referred to the Attorneys for Petitioner: Orly Taitz 29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy (949) 683-5411
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688 Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent: Kamala Harris Attorney General (916) 445-9555 P. O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

The decision of the Supreme Court will be released on Tuesday

President  Harrison J. Bounel

February 15, 2013  by Bob Livingston
Who is Harrison J. Bounel? According  to the 2009 tax returnsubmitted by President Barack Obama, he’s the President of the United States. All nine U.S. Supreme Court Justices are scheduled to discuss this anomaly today.
The case in  question is Edward Noonan, et al v. Deborah  Bowen, California Secretary of State, and the  Justices are finally looking at it thanks to the dogged determination of Orly  Taitz. The case calls into question many  of the documents Obama (Bounel, Soetoro, Soebarkah, etc.) has used and/or  released as authentic since he came on the national scene. The case contends  that the documents — birth certificate, Social Security number, Selective  Service registration, etc. — are fakes or forgeries. If that’s the case, Obama  should not have been on the California ballot in 2008 and, therefore, should not  have received the State’s electoral votes.
Four of the nine Justices must vote to move the case forward. We’ll see.
Meantime, on Feb.  4, Kathleen O’Leary, presiding judge of the 4thDistrict Court of  Appeal, reinstated the appeal of Taitz v. Obama et al filed by Taitz when  she ran for Senate. That case involves evidence of 1.5 million invalid voter  registrations in the State of California. The appeal also involves Obama’s lack  of legitimacy to hold the office of President based on his forged IDs, stolen  Connecticut Social Security number, the fact the last name he’s using is not  legally his and his fraudulent claim to be the U.S.  citizen.
Evidence in the  case includes:
  • A certified copy of the passport   records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, showing her son’s legal last   name to be Soebarkah, not Obama.
  • Obama’s school records from   Indonesia, showing his citizenship to be Indonesian.
  • Sworn affidavits of top law enforcement experts and investigators, showing Obama’s   birth certificate and Selective Service certificate are forgeries and that the Social Security number used by Obama on his 2009 tax returns as posted on WhiteHouse.gov was fraudulent. (The SSN failed when checked through both   E-Verify and the Social Security Number Verification   Service.)
  • On another legal  front, Obama defaulted in the case ofGrinols et al v. Obama et al on  Jan. 30 when he failed to file a response within 21 days of being served notice  of the suit. This case also involves Obama’s phony SSN.
    The suit  states:
    Investigator Albert Hendershot found in the database of http://www.acxiom.com/identity-solutions/acxiom-identity-batch-solutions/ the name of the individual whose Social Security Obama is using. Acxciom-batch-solutions showed (Exhibit 1) that Harry J Bounel with the same Social Security number xxx-xx-4425 at 5046 S Greenwood Ave in Chicago, home address of Barack Obama, Database shows Bounel with the same address and Social Security number as Barack Obama himself. According to the databases last changes to the information on Harrison (Harry) J Bounel were made in and around November 2009   by Michelle Obama, who is listed as Bounel’s relative. Database changes can involve entering the information or deletion of information. It appears that changes made by relative Michelle Obama included deletion of information, which was done at a time when Taitz brought to Federal court in the Central District of California before Judge David O. Carter a case of election challenge by her client, former U.S. ambassador Dr. Alan Keyes and 40 state Representatives and high ranked members of the U.S. Military.
  • Recently obtained results of the 1940 census, Exhibit 2, provided the last missing link, link (sic) between Harry J. Bounel and the date of birth of 1890.  Exhibit 2 shows the printout of the U.S. census, showing Harry J Bounel, immigrant from Russia, residing at 915 Daly Ave, Bronx, NY, age 50 during the 1940 census, meaning he was born in 1890, as shown in the affidavit of Investigators Daniels and Sankey.
    There is a pattern of Obstruction of Justice and tampering with the official records and   falsification/forgery of the official records related to Obama. This happens in particular when [George W.] Bush employees leave their positions and are replaced by Obama appointees.
    Taitz has asked for expedited default judgment and post judgment discovery in this case out of  fear that any records on hand at the Social Securityoffice will be destroyed when George W. Bush-appointed Commissioner Michael Astrue leaves office in February. Records that might have proven  Obama’s Selective Service registration was a forgery were destroyed in 2009  after Bush-appointed Selective Service Director William Chatfield resigned, Taitz alleges.
    Disclaimer: Dr. Taitz, Esq. has no means of checking the veracity of all the claims and allegations in the articles.
    From Orly Taitz:
    Some good news and some bad news. Good news is that the 9th circuit VACATED an order by Judge Guilford, when Guilford denied my motion to dismiss Berg and Liberi’s case in AntiSLAPP. That is great. Bad news, a transmission on my car suddenly died. Thank god it did not happen in the middle of the freeway, I could be dead.
  • The word is spreading, 2 million 30 thousand hits on Google under Orly Taitz, I am sure massive scrubbing will start right about now.

Related posts:

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

The date says Feb. 2013 has the courts ruled on this case or not, if so why happen we heard the out come.

Anonymous said...

I'm sure they'll issue a decision that Obama is guilty as charged and they will kick him out of the country and we will leave the earth on the huge mothership. And then we will all eat purple doughnuts from the Crispy Creme nebula.

Anonymous said...

The decision by the Supreme Court will be dismissed and null and void. Obama will remain in office. Do you actually think Supreme Court scumbags will let the cat out of the bag. Get Real!

smrstrauss said...

The answer is simple. The Supreme Court considered taking the case, as in fact it considers taking or not taking every case, and it decided NOT to take the case. In fact, it has not taken a single birther case---I wonder why not??

smrstrauss said...

Re Social Security number. The explanation is that birther sites have not told you that Social Security Administration clerks made data entry errors and that entering a zip code in a SS application will generate a wrong SS number.

http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html