Monday, November 18, 2013

WUA – NEWSWEEK COVER!!!! - "Peter principle" of management

WUA – NEWSWEEK COVER!!!! - "Peter principle" of management



        It is about time that the Media sees this man for what he has always been.  A total fraud that was   perpetrated upon this country by a band of zealots trying to change us to what has destroyed every other culture in history.  Let us hope the message catches on and is not too late.





Quoted from a friend, “When is the rest of the Obama loving media going to wake up and see this man for what he really is and how he is destroying our country?”


 

"NEWSWEEK COVER"!!!

 An interesting read particularly when you consider the

magazine's usual perspective. The best article written about the

dismal reign of the president. It illustrates the finest example of  the "Peter principle" of management ever seen.

He is finally getting the attention he so deserves and earned...


**********************************************************************

   AMAZING!!!  The Cover of Liberal Newsweek Magazine!!!




        Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama.

        This is timely and tough.  As many of you know, Newsweek has

        a reputation for being extremely liberal. The fact that their editor

       saw fit to print the following article about Obama and the one that

      appears in the latest Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event,

   and a news story in and of itself.  At last, the truth about our President

    and his agenda are starting to trickle through the protective wall built

                               around him by the liberal media....

______________________________________________________________

I Too Have Become Disillusioned

By Matt Patterson (Newsweek Columnist  Opinion Writer) 

                 Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of

           Barack Hussein Obama as an inscrutable and disturbing phenomenon,

       the result of a baffling breed of mass hysteria akin perhaps to the

        witch craze of the Middle Ages. How, they will wonder, did a man

         so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so many into

           thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct

            the world's most powerful military, execute the world's most

                                           consequential job?



       Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life:

         ushered into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable

           grades and test scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a

             "community organizer;" a brief career as a state legislator

            devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact nearly devoid

            of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); and finally

            an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate,

          the entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

              He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature

            legislation as a legislator. And then there is the matter of his

              troubling associations: the white-hating, America-loathing

        preacher who for decades served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;"

        a real-life, actual terrorist who served as Obama's colleague and

       political sponsor. It is easy to imagine a future historian looking at

             it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man elected president?



           Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz

            addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal:

       To be sure, no white candidate who had close associations with an

     outspoken hater of America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant

      terrorist like Bill Ayers, would have lasted a single day. But because

        Mr. Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of liberal

         Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American

        injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass.

      Let that sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard

                                  - because of the color of his skin.



               Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such ancient

          history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and

        (as he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him

        a fighting chance to become the first black president and thereby

                              to lay the curse of racism to rest?



              Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse of the

         Obama phenomenon - affirmative action. Not in the legal sense,

           of course. But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all

             affirmative action laws and regulations, which are designed

            primarily to make white people, and especially white liberals,

                                        feel good about themselves.



                 Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat

            themselves on the back. Liberals routinely admit minorities

                to schools for which they are not qualified, yet take no

             responsibility for the inevitable poor performance and high

                drop-out rates which follow. Liberals don't care if these

              minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the

               emotional devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting

              from the racist policy that is affirmative action. Yes, racist.

               Holding someone to a separate standard merely because

            of the color of his skin - that's affirmative action in a nutshell,

                                   and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.



                     And that is what America did to Obama. True, Obama

               himself was never troubled by his lack of achievements,

               but why would he be? As many have noted, Obama was

                      told he was good enough for Columbia despite

                 undistinguished grades at Occidental; he was told he

               was good enough for the US Senate despite a mediocre

               record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be

                     president despite no record at all in the Senate.

             All his life, every step of the way, Obama was told he was

              good enough for the next step, in spite of ample evidence

                                                    to the contrary.



                   What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism

             on display every time Obama speaks? In 2008, many who

             agreed that he lacked executive qualifications nonetheless

                 raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect, and cool

                    character. Those people conservatives included -

                                   ought now to be deeply embarrassed.



                   The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of clichés, and

             that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when

              the prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.



                      Not one original idea has ever issued from his mouth -

                it's all warmed-over Marxism of the kind that has failed

                over and over again for 100 years. (An example is his

                  2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for

                                          word his 2008 speeches)

                       And what about his character? Obama is constantly

                 blaming anything and everything else for his troubles.

                    Bush did it; it was bad luck; I inherited this mess.

              Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task.

                    It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to

                    advertise his own powerlessness, so comfortable

                with his own incompetence. (The other day he actually

                came out and said no one could have done anything to

               get our economy and country back on track). But really,

                   what were we to expect? The man has never been

                 responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to

                                               act responsibly?



                       In short: the president is a small-minded man, with

                  neither the temperament nor the intellect to handle

                  his job. When you understand that, and only when

               you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty

                 and prosperity make sense. It could not have gone

                 otherwise with such an impostor in the Oval Office.

Thanks Mark



Wake Up America – become a Member FREE right NOW!.....

American’s - Vs. – American’t……

www.WUA4u2.com – bottom right box on the home page – Join Free

WUA Campaigners & Wakers are making a difference!

Bob Burton, Florida State Director, an American

Cell - 941-587-9586


"In God We Trust"

1 NATION UNDER GOD

No comments: