Monday, September 16, 2013

The Clinton Foundation Larceny

The Clinton Foundation Larceny



Share147 Tweet59 Share0 Share280

The New York Times, in what Rush Limbaugh calls a “random act of journalism,” published an article exposing The Clinton Foundation’s larceny. The Times reports that despite having lost tens of millions of dollars since its shady inception, the Clintons will be moving ahead, full throttle, relocating the Foundation’s “nerve center” from its current, highly publicized and politically correct site in Harlem to mid-Manhattan, central to liberal media outlets.
In the process, the name of the Foundation is being changed from “The Clinton Foundation” to “The Bill, Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation.” Well, at least that appellation is more honest.
The Clinton family has been a blight visited upon the nation since a boozy, blustering, Slick Willy clambered out of Arkansas, grabbing the public’s eye, along with every female he could reach, and the presidency.http://www.cabi.org/ashc/uploads/file/ASHC/The_Clinton_Foundation.jpg
England’s Telegraph reports that Slick Willy met with attorneys and advisors over a year ago. Rather than progress having been made they
“concluded that (the Foundation) was a mess… But what complicated this review – what made its findings more politically devastating – is that the Clinton Foundation has become about more than just Bill. Now both daughter Chelsea and wife, and likely presidential candidate, Hillary Clinton have taken on major roles.”
The New York Times went further: “For all of its successes, the Clinton Foundation had become a sprawling concern, supervised by a rotating board of old Clinton hands, vulnerable to distraction and threatened by conflicts of interest. It ran multimillion-dollar deficits for several years, despite vast amounts of money flowing in.”
Not surprisingly, The Times is tens of millions of dollars short and almost two decades late. Their hesitant evaluation is incorrect. The Foundation wasn’t “threatened by conflicts of interest”; it is steeped in conflicts of interest. Nor has there been any success beyond swelling the Clintons’ coffers and the public’s acceptance of characteristic liberal bleating about good intentions.
The Times catalogues The Clinton Foundation’s commitment to cronyism and corruption over decades. Despite Bill’s ceaseless fundraising, money has disappeared like rain on the Sahara.  The Telegraph cites The New York Times, then adds its own conclusion: “‘efforts to insulate the foundation from potential conflicts have highlighted just how difficult it can be to disentangle the Clintons’ charity work from Mr. Clinton’s moneymaking ventures and Mrs. Clinton’s political future.’ Oh, they're entangled alright.”
And now there’s going to be a new hand on the pirate ship’s helm; once situated in more fashionable, midtown digs Hillary and her staff are moving in. The mission of the Foundation is morphing from its previous, AIDS-poverty-obesity-relieving intention, to reflect a Hillary-driven agenda. According to FOX News, Hillary “reportedly will focus on new initiatives covering women, jobs and other areas.” If this sounds like a campaign platform to you, your discriminatory skills are on target.
We’re told ceaselessly that Hillary is “the smartest woman in America.” One wonders how Medgar Evans’ family feels about that.[1]

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
Rate this (5 Votes)
Notes:
1.       “In a speech that denounced Voter ID efforts, Clinton referred to Medgar Evers as ‘Medger Evans’ while discussing how one of her mentors defused a volatile situation in Mississippi after Evers, who courageously organized voter registration efforts in the South, was assassinated.” []
Tagged with 
Bill Clinton Edgar Evers Hillary Clinton Manhattan Medgar Evans new york times The Clinton Foundation
26 thoughts on “The Clinton Foundation Larceny”
1.       JohnGalt says:
"The Clinton Foundation Larceny"
#######
Why the redundancy?
The deeply soiled name "Clinton" is wholly synonymous with "Larceny".
The oily, perjurious, unaccomplished, habitually corrupt Clintons, commit statist power-enabled felonies as reflexively as honest Americans breathe.
300
Rate this
o   Marilyn says:
It is worthy of note because The NYT has jumped on the "destroy Hillary" bandwagon. We all know they are low-life thieves and in competent boobs but why the formerly sycophantic Times has decided to, however gingerly, poke them with a pitch fork is interesting, don't you think? Think The Lyin' King is pulling some of his typical, Chicago thug antics to make life difficult for a 2016 run, perhaps?
90
Rate this
2.       jp says:
The Clinton name is synonymous with hatred for our military also. God help us if she runs and wins.
250
Rate this
3.       Rocky says:
In my opinion, Bill and Hill should move back to Little Rock and retire. Bill can work in his Presidential Library and Massage Parlor and Hillary on her book.
181
Rate this
4.       allen goldberg says:
Hillary the smartest woman in America? No even close..On her very worst day...Condi Rice's bowel movements are smarter!! As are many many others...Hillary maybe the most politically nasty, vile woman in america..but nothing more.
270
Rate this
o   Drik says:
Got a dollar sez that her mini-series neglects to mention her flunking the New York State bar exam.
Lib-progs are excruciatingly smart. They just aren't very good test takers.
130
Rate this
§  HMathis says:
Or that Hillary was fired from the Watergate investigation for lying and unethical behavior!
90
Rate this
o   Rattlerjake says:
You have to admit the clintons and the rest of the Washington libturds have perfected theft, fraud, self-indulgence, arrogance, immorality, and treason!
180
Rate this
5.       Mary Triola says:
Why are people surprised? The Clintons have been surrounded by scandal for years. So now suddenly the NYT is writing this. If these so called journalists weren't so busy sucking up to all the wrong people this would have been reported long ago. Bubba will always be Bubba. Hillary is a fraud. What did she do as senator? What did she do as Secretary.So why now is he changing the name. It is sad this is what our political system has become. We have the Alinskyites running OUR government. If you remember good old Hillary did her thesis on this radical. To quote Mark Levin Hillary is obama in a dress. Bubba has bribed people Hillary has bribed people. Their good friend Vince killed himself. Theses people are criminals it's that simple. How did little georgie porgie get his job with abc? These people never fade away. They are vain and need all the attention all the time.
80
Rate this
o   Richard says:
According to a few reports, Vince Foster did not kill himself, look it up.
50
Rate this
o   Marulyn says:
Levin is right.
But the surprise issue is just the point. No one is surprised except the Times. And they aren't, really, either. They're just trying to defuse the scandal before 2016 and, possibly, doing a mild hit piece on her at the behest of the Thug In Chief. Oh, yes; part of the (unfortunately) ongoing, incredibly tiresome saga of Clinton reruns is that it is still an open question of whether or not their "good friend" Vince killed himself; their "good friends" have the convenient habit of kicking the bucket before any inconvenient skeletons can be aired out of the Clinton closet.
One of the funniest and least talked about facts of Hillary's totally useless history (she's gotten nowhere except riding on the coattails of men, something she claims to deride) is that she started her political life as a devout Republican, working for Goldwater. She is a virulent joke and one that the libs can't wait to carry around on their shoulders...and saddle on our backs.
10
Rate this
6.       Drik says:
Let's take the lady who was directly responsible for security in Benghazi and make her responsible for the security of the whole friggin' country.
What could go wrong?
230
Rate this
o   Chuckster says:
They got 214 million last year in donations and come up 8 million short, so someone spent 222 million last year, hmmmmm can they show us where they spent it? And the dumb azz people of this country will probably elect this twit to run America .
160
Rate this
§  Rachel Guess says:
Chuckster,
Any non-profit is required by law to disclose both it's revenues and expenditures. Go to http://www.guidestar.org and create an account (it's free of charge) and you can look up the last three year's of tax returns for any non-profit organization.
30
Rate this
o   george cullen says:
SING IT BROTHER
30
Rate this
7.       AWKingsley says:
Actually Sarah Palin just proved she is the smartest woman in America: Sarah just announced her support for Rand Paul.
60
Rate this
8.       EPJ says:
WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE NOW ANYWAY?
61
Rate this
9.       Walter Luffman says:
I'd like to think the only problem is that the money is being "laundered" to make Bill, Hillary and Chelsea rich. Yeah, I'd like to think that; but somehow I think there's even more than that involved here. Is a big chunk of money going to others, perhaps outside America, who don't have our country's best interests at heart? Don't know, but I wonder.
100
Rate this
10.   BillWhit says:
Hitlery is supposed to be the Smartest Woman in America? Not even close, but she is the Most Corrupt and DisHonest Woman in America, right up there with the Skanky Sasquatch, Michelle Obama, which she has proven that over and over! No, the Skank of Bengazi needs to Retire and spend the rest of her days, unless convicted over her Lying over Bengazi, at her favorite Bull Dyke Bar in Arkansas!
70
Rate this
11.   david says:
Remember all this, and more come election time. Actually, she should not be permitted to get that far.
If only half of what has been reported in past years is true regarding the clinton's, she should be barred from running. Period.
But I can hear the liberals and socialists and the news media screaming about the past using these words:
"What Difference Dose It Make?"
Press 1 for America; Press 1 for Paul!
00
Rate this
12.   Bill says:
Probably would be investigated and found illegal if we had a REAL justice department.
20
Rate this
13.   Alcan says:
After years of practice in the art of corruption, both in the Ark. governor's house, followed by a successful run in the WH, why is anybody surprised that there are problems with the Clinton Foundation. But, not to worry, I'm sure that the Chinese will be more than happy to send over boatloads of money to help get another crooked Clinton into the White House. After all, the first one paid off extremely well for them, with Bill approving one of his buddies, Loral, to provide assistance in improving their missile control systems, followed by thousands of pages of top secret military information at the end of his term. Plus, who knows what else they got as a result of Chinagate.
00
Rate this
14.   A Patriot says:
What larceny? It's their foundation, idiots give them money and they take it, give it to their friends, or flush it down a toilet. What conflict of interest are you so concerned about. They are all lying thieves, so what? Is there any taxpayer money involved? Any bribery, extortion, or other corruption of government officials involved? This is a pure BS article spinning a tale going nowhere. There is no law with the Clintons or the scum in white house.
00
Rate this
o   Marilyn says:
It is larceny because it is categorized by them as a non-profit, not "their" foundation. Non-profits have strict rules and operating a non-profit at a loss is criminal. Like everything else these thieves do. Taxpayer money is involved.
00
Rate this
o   Pete0097 says:

People donate to the Foundation so they can buy the Clintons support. IT is a great idea. I wish I could do it. A lot of people on both sides have done it. I get e-mails from them all time. Some are from conservatives wanting to fight the liberals and some are from liberals wanting to fight the conservatives. All the same, they just want money. 

No comments: