OBOTIC MEDIA
DESPERATELY CHANGING LANGUAGE DEFENDING OBAMA’S ELIGIBILITY
FLEEING FROM BIRTH CERTIFICATE TO “LEGITIMACY” –
“A shocking change in the content of reporting at NBC, CNN
and CBS indicates the pro-Obama media are beginning to stagger under the weight
of facts which plainly show that Barack Obama has never provided valid,
corroborated documentation proving he is constitutionally eligible to hold the
office of president.”
By
Dan Crosby,
of
The Daily Pen
New
York, NY
- The pro-Obama, liberal mainstream media is showing symptoms of fatigue in
their endless defense of Barack Obama’s fraudulent identity.
A
sudden reverse in liberal media content indicates they are realizing defense of
Obama’s “eligibility” based on rapidly fading support of his fraudulent birth
certificate is no longer sustainable. The lies about Obama's identity
are becoming too heavy for those undersold as errand-slaves for
the bowing liberal consensus.
In
at least two broadcasts by CBS ad MSNBC, following Mitt Romney’s campaign rally
joke about his own birth certificate, hosts from the leftist networks used a
new word to defend Barack Obama’s fading credibility.
Legitimacy.
Legitimacy.
Defense
of Obama's "legitimacy", not "eligibility", is now
emanating from media propagandists indicating they can no longer defend
the lie that the digitally forged image of an alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live
Birth” proves he is “eligible” to be president. Now, they are desperately
hoping everyone will forget their abetment of the “eligibility by fake computer
image” lie and show grace for Obama’s contingent claims to “legitimacy by
popularity” instead.
On
Friday, Obama lover and "The Ed Show" host, Ed Schultz, instead of
defending the authenticity of Obama’s alleged birth document, which he has done
with vigor until now, used the word “legitimate” to defend Obama saying,
“Another day at the office with the “Mittster”. Today Mitt Romney
reignited the fringe, those in his party who don’t see Obama as a legitimate
president.”
See video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7sKRRb-plQ
See video at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7sKRRb-plQ
Then,
Romney’s joke evoked an almost desperate need from CBS’s Scott Pelley to hear
Romney say that Obama was a “legitimate” president, while Pelley completely
avoided the tired lie that the digital image of Obama's alleged 1961
“Certificate of Live Birth” posted on an official government website in April,
2011, was authenticated proof that Obama was eligible to be president.
See
the video here.
Pelley
asked Romney, “In the rally today, you said, ‘No one has ever asked for my
birth certificate. They know this is the place I was born and raised.’
Why did you say that?”
Romney
told Pelley the comment was a joke based on the fact that he and his wife, Ann,
were born and raised in Michigan. However, the only reason Romney
has for referencing a request of a birth certificate is Obama's failure to
provide a valid one over the past five years.
Pelley
then embarked a pathetic defense of Obama, “But, this was a swipe at the
president.”
"No,
no, not a swipe," Romney replied. "I've said throughout the campaign
and before, there's no question about where he was born. He was born in the
U.S. This was fun about us, and coming home. And humor, you know -- we've got
to have a little humor in a campaign."
Unconvinced
under the crushing weight of his chronic dissonance, Pelley then posited a
question which reveals the old lie is no longer effective and that he is
beginning to rethink his position on Obama’s alleged birth certificate and
constitutional eligibility.
“For the record, will you say, once and for all, that you believe Obama is a legitimate president?” pleaded Pelley.
“For the record, will you say, once and for all, that you believe Obama is a legitimate president?” pleaded Pelley.
Romney
replied with a confident smile, “I have said that 30 times, I guess 31 won’t
hurt.”
Romney
answer accompanied a light in his eyes indicating he now understands that a
question about Obama’s "legitimacy" is not the same as one
about his "eligibility". He also realized from Pelley’s
question that the media knows it, too.
“If
you have the wherewithal to suspect that sharks are preparing to attack because
they happen to smell blood in the water, perhaps instead of asking why the
sharks are attacking, you should ask, why am I bleeding?” asks TDP editor, Pen
Johannson.
“Obama
was bleeding credibility on the issue of his eligibility long before anyone
challenged him. The media is beginning to see this.”
Eligibility
is based on a legal requirement rooted in the rule of law and doctrinal
precedent over the past 250 years in America. Legitimacy, on the other
hand, is a transient status of subjective entitlement based on the fact that
voters supported the candidate, even though the candidate was never legally
eligible to be elected.
In
1840, John Tyler, serving as Vice President as the first ever candidate
eligible for the office of President born after the adoption of the U.S.
Constitution, became the first candidate required by the Constitution to be a
Natural Born citizen of the United States, which he was. However, Tyler
was also the first candidate to perform the duties of President without being
elected to the office. He was forced to assume the powers and duties of
president upon the untimely death of President William Henry Harrison just
after the 1840 election.
Many
in opposition to Harrison’s administration refused to acknowledge Tyler as a
“legitimate” President, even disparaging him as “His Accidency”.
Harrison's unprecedented death in office caused considerable confusion
regarding Tyler’s succession despite the fact that he was eligible.
Article
II, Section 1 of the Constitution merely states:
“In
Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation,
or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the same
shall devolve on the Vice President.”
The
Constitution did not endow Tyler with the title of President in his own right,
just the powers of the office. It only stated that the “Powers and
Duties” of the deceased President Harrison would “devolve” upon him as Vice
President, not that he would hold the office. Read literally, Tyler would
remain the Vice President with presidential powers, as Acting President, but he
could not be called “President of the United States”.
In
spite of his constitutional eligibility to be president, Tyler’s opponents
refused to acknowledge that he was a “legitimate” president. Therefore, it
is completely absurd for the liberal media to actually expect that Obama would
be considered “legitimate” without a shred of documented proof of
eligibility.
Obama’s legal right to hold office has never been verified because
he does not possess the historical proof to show that he meets the requirements
stipulated by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution.
DRIVING
OBOTS CRAZY
Shultz
and Pelley, like the remaining slew of pathological liars in the liberal
media, are being confronted with a terrifying reality that there is no proof
that Obama is actually who he claims to be, let alone be eligible to
be president. Moreover, they are realizing that only Obama, not original
sources, has been the only one they were allowed to receive information from
about his identity, which they willingly swallowed and so enthusiastically
defended as the truth.
Now,
they see the fox in the hen house. The shift in perception indicates the
delusions of liberal media are now being confronted with the reality that Obama
has poisoned and corrupted their personal and professional reputations.
They are beginning to think Obama might actually be a fraud.
Long
ago, CBS and NBC sold out to Obama’s lies and have no way to reconcile with the
soul crushing truth
so they no longer have the credibility to fight the cause for Obama based on
the losing proposition that the birth certificate represents the truth about
his identity. It does not. It
represents the greatest lie ever told to the American people,
and they are beginning to realize it.
Mitt
Romney’s recent joke about his own birth certificate, according to CBS, was
apparently an endorsement of suspicions by so-called “birthers” that “…ultimately
drove Mr. Obama to release his long-form birth certificate to prove he
was born in the United States.”
Yes,
a CBS writer, lost in ideological delusions about Obama’s eligibility grandeur,
actually used the word, “drove” in attempting to convince themselves of an
elusive reality about the intentions of Romney’s comment.
Of
course, CBS reporters can provide no documented proof that Romney’s comment was
directed at Barack Obama. Sounds a little like CBS believes there is a
coo-coo conspiracy to undermine Obama. They are beginning to sound more
like what they accuse so-called “birthers” of, every day.
CBS
and other liberal emanations seem to be slowly admitting, now, that the
derogatorily called “birther” movement must have had the power and facts to
“drive” the anointed One of a bowing liberal consensus to the brink of
destruction by forcing him to actually provide evidence that he is who he
says he is.
Think
about what CBS is claiming. A bunch of crazy, rightwing fringe racists
“drove” Obama to present a digitally fabricated image of an alleged 1961 birth
certificate which was proven by 10 month-long criminal investigation to be a
forgery?
They
sound like crazy left-wing conspiracy theorists. Acknowledging the power
to drive an alleged “legally eligible” president to prove his legitimacy is a
lot of respect to assign those formerly considered a bunch of crazy conspiracy
theorists.
Imbalanced
pundits like Shultz and Pelley are beginning to look like fools.
Labeling those who question Obama’s eligibility as racists and crazy people is
beginning to come back on liberals in a very destructive way. When the
truth is against you, your condemnations will return to haunt and destroy you
because no aspersion you cast holds credibility once the lies you defended are
exposed. At that point, you have become worthy of destruction and
ridicule.
Let’s
talk about Obama’s legitimacy, shall we?
After
all, sarcastically speaking, it’s not as if suspicions about Obama’s
illegitimacy were actually based on facts about his past, like the fact that
his alleged father was never a U.S. citizen…which means he is not a natural born citizen of the U.S. and therefore
not constitutionally eligible to be president based on 250 years of legal and doctrinal precedence.
Legitimacy?
Facts
- like, Obama voted in favor of congressional resolution 511 stating that his
2008 opponent, John McCain, was a natural born citizen because, unlike Obama,
both of McCain’s parents were U.S. citizens serving in the military and, therefore,
eligible to run for president, despite the fact that McCain was not born in the
U.S.
Legitimacy?
Obama lived to
Indonesia as a boy, attended school as Indonesian citizen as required by
Indonesian law and so stated on his school registration form, and has never
provided documentation showing that he retained his American citizenship upon
return to Hawaii in 1971.
Legitimacy?
Obama
traveled to Pakistan,
by his own admission, using a passport which would show his citizenship
status in 1980 and, yet, it has never been allowed to be seen by
anyone. Legitimacy?
Legitimacy?
Obama
refuses to provide his college transcripts which contain information
about whether or not he attended school as a foreign student, which would show
that if he received foreign scholarships he could not have applied as a U.S.
citizen.
Legitimacy?
The
Democrat Party of Hawaii chairman, Brian Schatz, refused
in August of 2008 to provide an “Official Certification of Nomination” containing legally required language under Hawaiian
election laws stating that Obama was “constitutionally eligible” to hold the
office of President.
Legitimacy?
Obama’s
literary publicist printed in an official promotional brochure for 16 years that
he was born in Kenya.
Legitimacy?
Obama’s
alleged Selective Service registration card, allegedly signed by Obama a
day AFTER it was stamped by a Honolulu postal worker, apparently using the only
two-digit year received stamp ever possessed by the U.S. post office, was determined by a six month law enforcement investigation
to be a forgery. Requests by investigators for the
original record from the Selective Service Administration were denied without
explanation.
Legitimacy?
The
digital .pdf image of his alleged 1961 Hawaiian
“Certificate of Live Birth” has been proven through a criminal investigation by
officials with decades of federal, state and local law enforcement
experience to be a fraud.
Legitimacy?
Obama’s
horde of puppets have a better chance of winning the eligibility
argument using the forged birth certificate.
2 comments:
Wrong....the greatest lie told to the American people is the 9/11 lie
Wake up people. What part of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA being a corporation do you not understand? As such, a corporation is not and does not have any constitutional authority and is therefore not bound by anything the constitution would require of a Constitutional Republic. In other words the constitution does not apply and the president is not required to be a citizen of the UNITED STATES, Inc. nor is any candidate required to show his/her tax returns. In fact, since the constitution doesn't apply, in regard to the UNITED STATES federal government, Inc., neither does the 16th, so called, income tax amendment or any of the other ones, for that matter. So the UNITED STATES federal government, Inc. has no constitutional authority to lay and collect a tax on anybody's income/wages or anything else. But they do have an ignorant populace that believes that they do because they believe the government is subject to constitutional authority. The comment about 9/11 being the greatest lie being told to the American people is right up there, near the top but it pale in comparison to the people believing the the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a country who's government operates under constitutional authority. It's NOT a country, it's a corporation. America is the country. So when you talk about the UNITED STATES federal government, Inc. forget about making any reference to the constitution because it does not apply. It aint bound by the constitution!
Post a Comment